Highline Forum (November 15, 2017)
A presentation was given to the Highline Forum describing previous studies of ultrafine PM near other airports, and a brief overview of the health effects associated with ultrafine PM. The powerpoint file for this presentation is available via this link:
Highline Forum Nov 15, 2017 PPT presentation
Study Advisory Group Meeting (January 5, 2018)
The Study Advisory Group met to discuss the study design and methods. Below are links to the presentation materials:
Study Advisory Group Jan 5, 2018 meeting materials
Study Advisory Group Jan 5, 2018 PPT presentation
Highline Forum (March 28, 2018)
A public meeting held at the Highline Forum in Federal Way on March 28, 2018 to discuss the study design and methods:
Study Advisory Group Meeting (August 15, 2018)
The Study Advisory Group met to discuss the study progress, preliminary data analysis methods and results. Below are links to the presentation materials:
Study Advisory Group Aug 15, 2018 meeting materials
Study Advisory Group Aug 15, 2018 poll results for prioritizing next steps
Highline Forum (January 23, 2019)
A public meeting held at the Highline Forum in Burien on January 23, 2019 to discuss the study progress, preliminary data analysis methods and results.
Seattle King County Board of Health (February 21, 2019)
A public meeting held at the Seattle King County Board of Health in Seattle to inform the board of the MOV-UP study.
Federal Way Council (April 2, 2019)
A public meeting held at Federal Way County Meeting to provide an update on the MOV-UP study and ideas for a longer-term UFP monitoring network.
FAA AEC Roadmap Meeting (May 20, 2019)
Airport Impact Study SeaTac City Hall (May 20, 2019)
An update on the MOV-UP study was presented at a public meeting held at SeaTac City Hall related to the Airport Impact Study.
Port of Seattle update (July 11, 2019)
An update on the MOV-UP study was presented to representatives of the Port of Seattle.
Study Advisory Group Meeting (September 4th, 2019)
A presentation of the final MOV-UP studies to the external advisory group. Part of the discussion included feedback on the interpretation and presentation of the results as well as identification of knowledge gaps and next steps resulting from the study findings.